↓ Skip to main content

Single versus Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
23 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
912 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single versus Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, December 2003
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa032290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel Attal, Jean-Luc Harousseau, Thierry Facon, François Guilhot, Chantal Doyen, Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet, Mathieu Monconduit, Cyrille Hulin, Denis Caillot, Reda Bouabdallah, Laurent Voillat, Jean-Jacques Sotto, Bernard Grosbois, Regis Bataille

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 239 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 47 19%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 40 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 1%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 47 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,061,478
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#17,308
of 30,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,357
of 133,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#57
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 117.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.