↓ Skip to main content

Microbial ecology and biogeochemistry of continental Antarctic soils

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial ecology and biogeochemistry of continental Antarctic soils
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Don A. Cowan, Thulani P. Makhalanyane, Paul G. Dennis, David W. Hopkins

Abstract

The Antarctica Dry Valleys are regarded as the coldest hyperarid desert system on Earth. While a wide variety of environmental stressors including very low minimum temperatures, frequent freeze-thaw cycles and low water availability impose severe limitations to life, suitable niches for abundant microbial colonization exist. Antarctic desert soils contain much higher levels of microbial diversity than previously thought. Edaphic niches, including cryptic and refuge habitats, microbial mats and permafrost soils all harbor microbial communities which drive key biogeochemical cycling processes. For example, lithobionts (hypoliths and endoliths) possess a genetic capacity for nitrogen and carbon cycling, polymer degradation, and other system processes. Nitrogen fixation rates of hypoliths, as assessed through acetylene reduction assays, suggest that these communities are a significant input source for nitrogen into these oligotrophic soils. Here we review aspects of microbial diversity in Antarctic soils with an emphasis on functionality and capacity. We assess current knowledge regarding adaptations to Antarctic soil environments and highlight the current threats to Antarctic desert soil communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
South Africa 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 186 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Student > Master 34 17%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 36%
Environmental Science 35 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 5%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 39 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,093,526
of 24,562,945 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,244
of 27,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,326
of 233,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#67
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,562,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.