| Title |
Of Babies and Bathwater: A Reply to Coyne and Tennen's Views on Positive Psychology and Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-010-9155-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa G. Aspinwall, Richard G. Tedeschi |
| Abstract |
We disagree with several conclusions reached by Coyne and Tennen, as well as their interpretation of specific findings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 26% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 90 | 64% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2011.
All research outputs
#4,130,435
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#403
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,140
of 167,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.