↓ Skip to main content

Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00359-014-0904-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne S. Leonard, Pavel Masek

Abstract

Karl von Frisch's studies of bees' color vision and chemical senses opened a window into the perceptual world of a species other than our own. A century of subsequent research on bees' visual and olfactory systems has developed along two productive but independent trajectories, leaving the questions of how and why bees use these two senses in concert largely unexplored. Given current interest in multimodal communication and recently discovered interplay between olfaction and vision in humans and Drosophila, understanding multisensory integration in bees is an opportunity to advance knowledge across fields. Using a classic ethological framework, we formulate proximate and ultimate perspectives on bees' use of multisensory stimuli. We discuss interactions between scent and color in the context of bee cognition and perception, focusing on mechanistic and functional approaches, and we highlight opportunities to further explore the development and evolution of multisensory integration. We argue that although the visual and olfactory worlds of bees are perhaps the best-studied of any non-human species, research focusing on the interactions between these two sensory modalities is vitally needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 221 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 20%
Student > Master 38 17%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 53%
Neuroscience 24 10%
Environmental Science 16 7%
Psychology 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 40 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1,225
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,687
of 229,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.