↓ Skip to main content

“The Neuroscience of Responsibility”—Workshop Report

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
“The Neuroscience of Responsibility”—Workshop Report
Published in
Neuroethics, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12152-010-9078-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole A Vincent, Pim Haselager, Gert-Jan Lokhorst

Abstract

This is a report on the 3-day workshop "The Neuroscience of Responsibility" that was held in the Philosophy Department at Delft University of Technology in The Netherlands during February 11th-13th, 2010. The workshop had 25 participants from The Netherlands, Germany, Italy, UK, USA, Canada and Australia, with expertise in philosophy, neuroscience, psychology, psychiatry and law. Its aim was to identify current trends in neurolaw research related specifically to the topic of responsibility, and to foster international collaborative research on this topic. The workshop agenda was constructed by the participants at the start of each day by surveying the topics of greatest interest and relevance to participants. In what follows, we summarize (1) the questions which participants identified as most important for future research in this field, (2) the most prominent themes that emerged from the discussions, and (3) the two main international collaborative research project plans that came out of this meeting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 7%
Italy 2 5%
Australia 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 36 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 13 30%
Psychology 8 18%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 4 9%