↓ Skip to main content

Musculoskeletal pain and school bag use: a cross-sectional study among Ugandan pupils

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Musculoskeletal pain and school bag use: a cross-sectional study among Ugandan pupils
Published in
BMC Research Notes, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erisa S Mwaka, Ian G Munabi, William Buwembo, John Kukkiriza, Joseph Ochieng

Abstract

Though seen as a convenient method of carrying books and other scholastic materials including food items, schoolbags are believed to contribute to back and other musculoskeletal problems in school going children. This study set out to determine the prevalence of low back and other musculoskeletal pains and describe their relationship with schoolbag use in pupils.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 19%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 14 7%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 20%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 60 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,709,098
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#534
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,825
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#10
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.