| Title |
The detection of CMV pp65 and IE1 in glioblastoma multiforme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11060-010-0383-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth G. Lucas, Lei Bao, Richard Bruggeman, Kimberly Dunham, Charles Specht |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,064
of 2,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,358
of 95,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,987 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.