| Title |
Elements of Team-Based Care in a Patient-Centered Medical Home Are Associated with Lower Burnout Among VA Primary Care Employees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2702-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian D. Helfrich, Emily D. Dolan, Joseph Simonetti, Robert J. Reid, Sandra Joos, Bonnie J. Wakefield, Gordon Schectman, Richard Stark, Stephan D. Fihn, Henry B. Harvey, Karin Nelson |
| Abstract |
A high proportion of the US primary care workforce reports burnout, which is associated with negative consequences for clinicians and patients. Many protective factors from burnout are characteristics of patient-centered medical home (PCMH) models, though even positive organizational transformation is often stressful. The existing literature on the effects of PCMH on burnout is limited, with most findings based on small-scale demonstration projects with data collected only among physicians, and the results are mixed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 25% |
| Unknown | 44 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Psychology | 15 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,940,591
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,461
of 8,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,179
of 241,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.