↓ Skip to main content

Cross-Cultural Comparison of Successful Aging Definitions Between Chinese and Hmong Elders in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Cross-Cultural Comparison of Successful Aging Definitions Between Chinese and Hmong Elders in the United States
Published in
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10823-014-9231-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annie L. Nguyen, David W. Seal

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to elicit the definitions of successful aging according to Chinese and Hmong elders living in Milwaukee, WI. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 44 elders (Hmong n = 21 and Chinese n = 23). Findings show some similarities in the Chinese and Hmong elders' definitions though specific cultural differences exist. Chinese elders emphasized physical health and mobility, mental health, positive attitudes, shedding responsibilities, positive family relationships, financial stability, social engagement, religious faith, and accomplishments and volunteer work. Hmong elders emphasized physical health and mobility, mental health, harmonious relationships, positive family relationships, tangible family support, financial stability, social engagement, and religious faith. Cross-cultural comparisons of the findings highlight the cultural heterogeneity between these two subgroups. Implications for practice are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 28%
Psychology 22 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,491
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
#139
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,727
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.