↓ Skip to main content

The Value of Positive Psychology for Health Psychology: Progress and Pitfalls in Examining the Relation of Positive Phenomena to Health

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
441 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Value of Positive Psychology for Health Psychology: Progress and Pitfalls in Examining the Relation of Positive Phenomena to Health
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9153-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa G. Aspinwall, Richard G. Tedeschi

Abstract

The growth of the "positive psychology" movement reflects increased scientific and lay interest in the relation of positive phenomena to mental and physical health and the corresponding potential for interventions that promote positive feelings, thoughts, and experiences to improve health and well-being. In this article, we (1) consider research on optimism, sense of coherence, and posttraumatic growth that predates the contemporary emphasis on positive psychology, but has clear and increasingly well-supported connections to health psychology, (2) examine several potential mechanisms through which such positive phenomena may influence the etiology, progression, and management of illness, (3) identify four pervasive but misleading assumptions about positive phenomena that may limit both scientific research and practical application, and (4) caution against serious pitfalls of popular views of positive thinking, such as its promotion as a cure for cancer and other diseases. We conclude with recommendations for the balanced scientific investigation and application of positive phenomena.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 409 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 17%
Student > Bachelor 55 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 9%
Researcher 34 8%
Other 106 24%
Unknown 55 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 257 58%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 8%
Social Sciences 24 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 3%
Arts and Humanities 10 2%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 67 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#814,594
of 23,987,854 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#109
of 1,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,153
of 169,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,987,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.