↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive abilities in siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive abilities in siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00221-014-3935-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentina Gizzonio, Pietro Avanzini, Maddalena Fabbri-Destro, Cristina Campi, Giacomo Rizzolatti

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the cognitive profiles of children with autistic spectrum disorder and of their healthy siblings (Siblings). With the term cognitive profile, we indicate the relationship extant among the values of verbal and performance subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. The conducted statistical analyses indicated that, although siblings showed a normal intelligent quotient and did not differ in this aspect from typically developing group, their cognitive profile was amazingly similar to that of their relatives affected by autism. A k-means clustering analysis on the values of single subtests further confirmed this result, showing a clear separation between typically developing children on the one side, and autistics and their siblings on the other. We suggest that the common cognitive profile observed in autistic children and their siblings could represent a marker of liability to autism and, thus, a possible intermediate phenotype of this syndrome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 35%
Neuroscience 8 12%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,491
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,006
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,727
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#31
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.