↓ Skip to main content

Using Friends as Sensors to Detect Global-Scale Contagious Outbreaks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
166 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
9 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Friends as Sensors to Detect Global-Scale Contagious Outbreaks
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Garcia-Herranz, Esteban Moro, Manuel Cebrian, Nicholas A. Christakis, James H. Fowler

Abstract

Recent research has focused on the monitoring of global-scale online data for improved detection of epidemics, mood patterns, movements in the stock market political revolutions, box-office revenues, consumer behaviour and many other important phenomena. However, privacy considerations and the sheer scale of data available online are quickly making global monitoring infeasible, and existing methods do not take full advantage of local network structure to identify key nodes for monitoring. Here, we develop a model of the contagious spread of information in a global-scale, publicly-articulated social network and show that a simple method can yield not just early detection, but advance warning of contagious outbreaks. In this method, we randomly choose a small fraction of nodes in the network and then we randomly choose a friend of each node to include in a group for local monitoring. Using six months of data from most of the full Twittersphere, we show that this friend group is more central in the network and it helps us to detect viral outbreaks of the use of novel hashtags about 7 days earlier than we could with an equal-sized randomly chosen group. Moreover, the method actually works better than expected due to network structure alone because highly central actors are both more active and exhibit increased diversity in the information they transmit to others. These results suggest that local monitoring is not just more efficient, but also more effective, and it may be applied to monitor contagious processes in global-scale networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Australia 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 168 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 24%
Student > Master 27 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 49 25%
Social Sciences 33 17%
Mathematics 12 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Other 52 27%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#170,437
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,566
of 224,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,332
of 242,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 5,345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.