↓ Skip to main content

Caregiver Burden in Parkinson Disease: A Critical Review of Recent Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caregiver Burden in Parkinson Disease: A Critical Review of Recent Literature
Published in
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, July 2017
DOI 10.1177/0891988717720302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip E. Mosley, Rebecca Moodie, Nadeeka Dissanayaka

Abstract

Burden is a negative psychological state induced in caregivers by the demands of providing care to a person with an illness or a disability. Managing caregiver burden in Parkinson disease (PD) is significant because informal caregivers make a substantial contribution to the well-being of persons with PD, incurring financial, social, and personal losses. Failure to recognize and manage caregiver burden may lead to burnout and premature institutionalization of the person with PD. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify and summarize factors that may amplify burden, including motor and nonmotor symptoms of PD, caregiver psychiatric symptoms, and caregiver coping style. We review instruments designed to sample the construct of burden among caregivers and evaluate interventions that may reduce burden, either by directly targeting caregivers or by treating PD symptoms associated with burden. We aim to provide a concise synopsis of these issues for the clinician or researcher working with this population in order to facilitate recognition of caregiver burden, provide accurate assessment, administer appropriate interventions, and stimulate further research in this area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 323 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 13%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Other 61 19%
Unknown 109 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 11%
Neuroscience 18 6%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 124 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,424,793
of 23,666,535 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
#207
of 520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,681
of 317,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,535 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.