↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship of Ecological and Geographic Factors to Gambling Behavior and Pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 1,014)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
The Relationship of Ecological and Geographic Factors to Gambling Behavior and Pathology
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10899-004-4582-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W. Welte, William F. Wieczorek, Grace M. Barnes, Marie-Cecile Tidwell, Joseph H. Hoffman

Abstract

The current study examined the effect of neighborhood disadvantage and gambling availability on gambling participation and pathology. A national telephone survey included 2631 US adults. Census data was used to characterize the respondent's neighborhood, and the distance from the respondent's home to gambling facilities was calculated. Logistic and linear regressions were performed to predict gambling participation and pathology. Results showed that the neighborhood disadvantage was positively related to frequency of gambling and problem/pathological gambling. The presence of a casino within 10 miles of the respondent's home was positively related to problem/pathological gambling. The permissiveness of gambling laws was positively related to any gambling in the past year, as well as frequent gambling. These results were interpreted to mean that the ecology of disadvantaged neighborhoods promotes gambling pathology, and that availability of gambling opportunities promotes gambling participation and pathology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Psychology 12 14%
Mathematics 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#634,279
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#39
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,047
of 153,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them