↓ Skip to main content

Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in Health & Place, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,871)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
38 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
622 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence
Published in
Health & Place, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Chawla, Kelly Keena, Illène Pevec, Emily Stanley

Abstract

This paper investigates how green schoolyards can reduce stress and promote protective factors for resilience in students. It documents student responses to green schoolyards in Maryland and Colorado in the United States under three conditions: young elementary school children׳s play in wooded areas during recess; older elementary school children׳s use of a naturalized habitat for science and writing lessons; and high school students׳ involvement in gardening. Drawing on ethnographic observations and interviews, it describes how the natural areas enabled students to escape stress, focus, build competence, and form supportive social groups. These findings have implications for theories of resilience and restoration and school interventions for stress management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 622 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 605 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 143 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 13%
Student > Bachelor 66 11%
Researcher 54 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 7%
Other 98 16%
Unknown 135 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 127 20%
Psychology 83 13%
Environmental Science 58 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 4%
Other 132 21%
Unknown 168 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 485. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#55,435
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Health & Place
#5
of 1,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370
of 241,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health & Place
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.