↓ Skip to main content

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2572 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1575 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2010
DOI 10.1200/jco.2009.25.6529
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Daniel F. Hayes, Mitch Dowsett, D. Craig Allred, Karen L. Hagerty, Sunil Badve, Patrick L. Fitzgibbons, Glenn Francis, Neil S. Goldstein, Malcolm Hayes, David G. Hicks, Susan Lester, Richard Love, Pamela B. Mangu, Lisa McShane, Keith Miller, C. Kent Osborne, Soonmyung Paik, Jane Perlmutter, Anthony Rhodes, Hironobu Sasano, Jared N. Schwartz, Fred C.G. Sweep, Sheila Taube, Emina Emilia Torlakovic, Paul Valenstein, Giuseppe Viale, Daniel Visscher, Thomas Wheeler, R. Bruce Williams, James L. Wittliff, Antonio C. Wolff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,575 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Serbia 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Other 21 1%
Unknown 1528 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 227 14%
Researcher 192 12%
Student > Bachelor 166 11%
Student > Master 165 10%
Other 121 8%
Other 334 21%
Unknown 370 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 590 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 171 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 165 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 44 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 3%
Other 155 10%
Unknown 409 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#867,754
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,109
of 20,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,554
of 97,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#8
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.