| Title |
The intrinsic value of choice: The propensity to under-delegate in the face of potential gains and losses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11166-017-9259-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez, Cass R. Sunstein, Tali Sharot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 308 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 79 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 10% |
| Canada | 15 | 5% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 114 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 223 | 72% |
| Scientists | 63 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 44 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#164,687
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#6
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,430
of 328,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them