↓ Skip to main content

The perinatal presentation of cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The perinatal presentation of cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome
Published in
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.36558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kara N. Wong Ramsey, Matthew H. Loichinger, Thomas P. Slavin, Sheree Kuo, Laurie H. Seaver

Abstract

There is limited information available related to the perinatal course of cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFC) compared to other syndromes within the Ras-MAP kinase pathway (rasopathies) such as Noonan and Costello syndrome. Retrospective chart review revealed four cases of CFC with molecular confirmation between 2005 and 2012 at Hawaii's largest obstetric and pediatric referral center. We report on details of the prenatal, neonatal, and infancy course and long-term follow-up beyond infancy in two patients. This report includes novel features including systemic hypertension, hyponatremia, and chronic respiratory insufficiency, not previously reported in CFC. We provide pathologic diagnosis of loose anagen hair in one patient. Some of these findings have been reported in the other rasopathies, documenting further clinical overlap among these conditions. Molecular testing can be useful to differentiate CFC from other rasopathies and in counseling families about potential complications and prognosis. We recommend a full phenotypic evaluation including echocardiogram, renal ultrasound, brain imaging, and ophthalmology examination. We additionally recommend close follow-up of blood pressure, pulmonary function, and monitoring for electrolyte disturbance and extra-vascular fluid shifts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#3,689
of 4,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,998
of 241,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#86
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.