| Title |
Clinicopathologic Features of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EML4–ALK Fusion Gene
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-009-0808-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Makoto Sonobe, Masashi Kobayashi, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Toshi Menju, Ei Nakayama, Nobuya Mino, Shotaro Iwakiri, Kiyoshi Sato, Ryo Miyahara, Kenichi Okubo, Toshiaki Manabe, Hiroshi Date |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,162
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,016
of 182,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.