↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Defining Blanking Period Post-Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Defining Blanking Period Post-Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.01.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pouria Alipour, Zahra Azizi, Meysam Pirbaglou, Paul Ritvo, Alfredo Pantano, Atul Verma, Yaariv Khaykin

Abstract

This study sought to determine the exact period after pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVI) during which early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) does not predict late arrhythmia recurrence (LR), in order to better define the blanking period. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation after PVI is not uncommon. The first 3 months after PVI have been commonly treated as a blanking period, during which ERAT is not thought to predict LR after PVI; however, recent studies have shown that ERAT does predict LR. Baseline and follow-up data for 636 patients (mean age: 61.4 ± 10.6 years; 67.1% male; 59% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; 31.4% ERAT) who underwent PVI between 2010 and 2014 were included. Recurrences were monitored by electrocardiography and Holter monitoring at 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month intervals post-procedure. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to define the blanking period after PVI. Overall, 51%, 76%, and 92% of patients who had ERAT in the first, second, and third month post-PVI, respectively, also experienced LR (p = 0.001). Using a logistic regression model, those manifesting ERAT during the first, second, and third month post-PVI were 4.22, 9.03, and 19.43 (p = 0.001) times more likely to experience LR, respectively, compared to those without ERAT. Furthermore, receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that 23 days post-PVI is the optimal cutoff date for the blanking period, with area under the curve of 0.7, sensitivity of 69.2%, and specificity of 61.2%. The likelihood of experiencing LR progressively rises with ERAT after the first month post-PVI. Blanking period after PVI should be limited to the first 23 days clinically and in future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 16%
Unspecified 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Professor 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Unspecified 7 14%
Mathematics 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,556,391
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#752
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,992
of 323,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.