↓ Skip to main content

Mental time travel and the shaping of the human mind

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
540 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mental time travel and the shaping of the human mind
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, May 2009
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2008.0301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Suddendorf, Donna Rose Addis, Michael C. Corballis

Abstract

Episodic memory, enabling conscious recollection of past episodes, can be distinguished from semantic memory, which stores enduring facts about the world. Episodic memory shares a core neural network with the simulation of future episodes, enabling mental time travel into both the past and the future. The notion that there might be something distinctly human about mental time travel has provoked ingenious attempts to demonstrate episodic memory or future simulation in non-human animals, but we argue that they have not yet established a capacity comparable to the human faculty. The evolution of the capacity to simulate possible future events, based on episodic memory, enhanced fitness by enabling action in preparation of different possible scenarios that increased present or future survival and reproduction chances. Human language may have evolved in the first instance for the sharing of past and planned future events, and, indeed, fictional ones, further enhancing fitness in social settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 540 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 2%
United States 10 2%
Germany 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 15 3%
Unknown 481 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 21%
Researcher 89 16%
Student > Master 78 14%
Student > Bachelor 68 13%
Professor 28 5%
Other 100 19%
Unknown 62 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 205 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 11%
Neuroscience 52 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 4%
Philosophy 20 4%
Other 95 18%
Unknown 83 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#257,059
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#188
of 7,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#510
of 105,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.