↓ Skip to main content

An additional dose of cefazolin for intraoperative prophylaxis

Overview of attention for article published in Surgery Today, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
An additional dose of cefazolin for intraoperative prophylaxis
Published in
Surgery Today, December 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02482213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Ohge, Yoshio Takesue, Takashi Yokoyama, Yoshiaki Murakami, Eiso Hiyama, Yujiro Yokoyama, Tetsuya Kanehiro, Hideyuki Itaha, Yuichiro Matsuura

Abstract

We examined the pancreatic tissue concentrations of cefazolin in ten patients undergoing pancreatectomy, and determined the optimal intraoperative time to deliver a repeat dose of cefazolin. An intravenous bolus dose of 1 g cefazolin was administered at the time of skin incision. Peripheral blood, subcutaneous adipose tissue, and peritoneal samples were obtained intraoperatively every hour for 4 h after the antibiotic was first administered, and pancreatic tissue samples were obtained at the time of pancreatectomy. To determine adequate tissue levels of cefazolin, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were measured for four bacterial species, namely 360 isolates of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 204 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 314 isolates of Escherichia coli, and 30 isolates of Streptococcus spp. The antibiotic concentrations in adipose tissue and peritoneum 3 h after the administration of cefazolin were lower than the MIC80 for K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and Streptococcus spp. Most pancreatic tissue samples showed antibiotic concentrations greater than the MIC80 for these bacterial species; however, those from four patients complicated by severe chronic pancreatitis, massive intraoperative bleeding, or obesity showed concentrations lower than the MIC80. Thus, we recommend that a second dose of cefazolin be given 3 h after the first administration to maintain adequate levels of antibiotic activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 30%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Computer Science 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,383,331
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#93
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,974
of 105,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them