| Title |
Effect of Body Composition on Outcomes after Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3686-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shinji Itoh, Ken Shirabe, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Shohei Yoshiya, Jun Muto, Norifumi Harimoto, Yo-ichi Yamashita, Toru Ikegami, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Akihiro Nishie, Yoshihiko Maehara |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the effect of body composition on outcomes after hepatic resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,968
of 6,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,345
of 228,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#61
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.