↓ Skip to main content

The effects of age, rank and neophobia on social learning in horses

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
The effects of age, rank and neophobia on social learning in horses
Published in
Animal Cognition, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0696-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstanze Krueger, Kate Farmer, Jürgen Heinze

Abstract

Social learning is said to meet the demands of complex environments in which individuals compete over resources and cooperate to share resources. Horses (Equus caballus) were thought to lack social learning skills because they feed on homogenously distributed resources with few reasons for conflict. However, the horse's social environment is complex, which raises the possibility that its capacity for social transfer of feeding behaviour has been underestimated. We conducted a social learning experiment using 30 socially kept horses of different ages. Five horses, one from each group, were chosen as demonstrators, and the remaining 25 horses were designated observers. Observers from each group were allowed to watch their group demonstrator opening a feeding apparatus. We found that young, low-ranking and more exploratory horses learned by observing older members of their own group, and the older the horse, the more slowly it appeared to learn. Social learning may be an adaptive specialisation to the social environment. Older animals may avoid the potential costs of acquiring complex and potentially disadvantageous feeding behaviours from younger group members. We argue that horses show social learning in the context of their social ecology and that research procedures must take such contexts into account. Misconceptions about the horse's sociality may have hampered earlier studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 46%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 38 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,660,321
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#535
of 1,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,816
of 212,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.