| Title |
Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared with conventional B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-003-2191-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Hohl, Thorsten Schmidt, Patrick Haage, Dagmar Honnef, Marcus Blaum, Gundula Staatz, Rolf W. Guenther |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 32% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 43% |
| Engineering | 5 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,360
of 4,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,333
of 145,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.