↓ Skip to main content

Multiplicative Adams Bashforth–Moulton methods

Overview of attention for article published in Numerical Algorithms, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 155)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Multiplicative Adams Bashforth–Moulton methods
Published in
Numerical Algorithms, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11075-010-9437-2
Authors

Emine Misirli, Yusuf Gurefe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 28%
Engineering 4 22%
Computer Science 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Numerical Algorithms
#20
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,371
of 181,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerical Algorithms
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them