↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Information Processing Between the Brain and Peripheral Physiological Systems in Pacing and Perception of Effort

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
339 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Information Processing Between the Brain and Peripheral Physiological Systems in Pacing and Perception of Effort
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200636080-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Clair St Gibson, Estelle V. Lambert, Laurie H. G. Rauch, Ross Tucker, Denise A. Baden, Carl Foster, Timothy D. Noakes

Abstract

This article examines how pacing strategies during exercise are controlled by information processing between the brain and peripheral physiological systems. It is suggested that, although several different pacing strategies can be used by athletes for events of different distance or duration, the underlying principle of how these different overall pacing strategies are controlled is similar. Perhaps the most important factor allowing the establishment of a pacing strategy is knowledge of the endpoint of a particular event. The brain centre controlling pace incorporates knowledge of the endpoint into an algorithm, together with memory of prior events of similar distance or duration, and knowledge of external (environmental) and internal (metabolic) conditions to set a particular optimal pacing strategy for a particular exercise bout. It is proposed that an internal clock, which appears to use scalar rather than absolute time scales, is used by the brain to generate knowledge of the duration or distance still to be covered, so that power output and metabolic rate can be altered appropriately throughout an event of a particular duration or distance. Although the initial pace is set at the beginning of an event in a feedforward manner, no event or internal physiological state will be identical to what has occurred previously. Therefore, continuous adjustments to the power output in the context of the overall pacing strategy occur throughout the exercise bout using feedback information from internal and external receptors. These continuous adjustments in power output require a specific length of time for afferent information to be assessed by the brain's pace control algorithm, and for efferent neural commands to be generated, and we suggest that it is this time lag that crates the fluctuations in power output that occur during an exercise bout. These non-monotonic changes in power output during exercise, associated with information processing between the brain and peripheral physiological systems, are crucial to maintain the overall pacing strategy chosen by the brain algorithm of each athlete at the start of the exercise bout.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 391 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 20%
Student > Master 76 19%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 78 19%
Unknown 69 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 179 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Psychology 24 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 2%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 88 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#796,873
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#735
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,509
of 202,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#103
of 979 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 979 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.