↓ Skip to main content

Immunopotentiating properties of extracellular polysaccharide from Trametes hirsuta strain VKESR

Overview of attention for article published in Carbohydrate Polymers, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunopotentiating properties of extracellular polysaccharide from Trametes hirsuta strain VKESR
Published in
Carbohydrate Polymers, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shenbhagaraman R, Premalatha M K, Jenefar S, Jagadish L K, Saravanamurali K, Kaveri K, Karthik S N, Kaviyarasan V

Abstract

The effectiveness of extracellular polysaccharides isolated from Trametes hirsuta strain VKESR was evaluated for their immunostimulating properties by in vitro lymphocyte proliferation, phagocytic assay, NK cell activity and cytokine quantification. The splenocyte proliferation assay showed that the extracellular glucans found to have good stimulation index and enhances the NK cell mediated tumor killing. It promotes phagocytosis in treated macrophages in a dose dependent manner. Furthermore, the polysaccharides exhibit significant stimulatory effect on cytokines IL-2 and IFN-γ whereas the polysaccharide has moderate stimulatory effect pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α. These immunostimulating properties help in combating various diseases and could be a promising beginning for further research to study the role of extracellular polysaccharide on the host immune systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Philosophy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,239,707
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Carbohydrate Polymers
#519
of 5,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,043
of 324,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbohydrate Polymers
#9
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.