↓ Skip to main content

E-Learning in Newborn Health – A Paradigm Shift for Continuing Professional Development for Doctors and Nurses

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
E-Learning in Newborn Health – A Paradigm Shift for Continuing Professional Development for Doctors and Nurses
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12098-014-1362-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aparna Chandrasekaran, Anu Thukral, Ashok K. Deorari

Abstract

Neonatal mortality can be largely prevented by wide-scale coverage of components of essential newborn care and management of sick neonates in district-level healthcare facilities. A vital step in this direction is imparting the requisite knowledge and skill among healthcare providers. Medical education programs with their static curricula seldom adapt to the changing needs of neonatal healthcare providers in patient-centered, collaborative and remote delivery contexts. E-learning is emerging as the cutting edge tool towards refinement of knowledge, attitude and practices of physicians. Module-based e-learning courses can be blended with a skill learning contact period in partnering institutions thus saving resources and rapidly covering a wide geographical region with uniform standardized education. In this review, the authors discuss their experience with e-learning aimed at introducing and refining the understanding of sick newborn care among pre-service and in-service doctors who manage neonates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,491
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#919
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,163
of 221,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.