↓ Skip to main content

Role of Written Advance Directives in Decision Making

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Role of Written Advance Directives in Decision Making
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00132.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan M. Teno, Marguerite Stevens, Stephanie Spernak, Joanne Lynn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Librarian 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Computer Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,989
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,643
of 134,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#103
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.