| Title |
Best practice for needlestick injuries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00068-014-0376-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Wicker, F. Walcher, S. Wutzler, C. Stephan, I. Marzi |
| Abstract |
Needlestick injuries (NSIs) are a significant health hazard. Occupational transmission of bloodborne pathogens among healthcare workers (HCWs) is rare but has been repeatedly reported in the literature. In October 2010, new regulations were introduced for medical aftercare of HCWs following NSIs at the University Hospital Frankfurt. In June 2013, a university hospital-wide early intervention program was introduced that gives HCWs immediate 24/7/365 access to an HIV postexposure prophylaxis kit after confirmed or probable occupational HIV exposure. Interdisciplinary collaboration between the attending surgeon and occupational health as well as infectious disease specialists facilitates optimal postexposure medical treatment of HCWs who suffer NSIs. Complete reporting of NSIs is a prerequisite for achieving optimal treatment of the affected HCWs. An NSI is an emergency and needs to be evaluated immediately and, if necessary, treated as soon as possible. A standardized algorithm for initial diagnostic and treatment has proven to be helpful. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |