↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of medication errors at a large tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of medication errors at a large tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective analysis
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11096-017-0514-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheraz Ali, Nourah Ibrahim Aboheimed, Ibrahim Abdulaziz Al-Zaagi, Dalal Salem Al-Dossari

Abstract

Background Medication errors (MEs) are common in health care settings and pose a threat for the hospitalized population. Therefore, aspects of MEs were explored in a tertiary setting serving a diverse population. Objective To examine the occurrence, severity and reporting of MEs in hospitalized patients. Methods This retrospective analysis included 10,683 ME report forms that were received by the Medication Safety Unit of King Saud Medical City (KSMC) in 2015. ME outcomes were determined according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Index for categorizing MEs algorithm. Results A total of 13,677 MEs in 912,500 prescriptions were reported. The incidence rate of MEs was 1.5% (13,677/912,500). The highest percentage (42.2%) of MEs occurred during the transcription stage, and 70.0% of MEs were reported as near misses. Wrong frequency and wrong concentration accounted for nearly half of the MEs. Conclusion We found 1.5 MEs per 100 prescriptions; more than two-thirds of the MEs were preventable and were intercepted before reaching the patients. Most MEs reported by pharmacists occurred at the transcription stage while wrong frequency was the most common error type encountered. Further studies should explore the clinical consequences of MEs at a healthcare institution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 42%