You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Severe osteoarthritis of the hand associates with common variants within the ALDH1A2 gene and with rare variants at 1p31
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.2957 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Unnur Styrkarsdottir, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Hafdis T Helgadottir, Nils Bomer, Sarah Metrustry, S Bierma-Zeinstra, Annelieke M Strijbosch, Evangelos Evangelou, Deborah Hart, Marian Beekman, Aslaug Jonasdottir, Asgeir Sigurdsson, Finnur F Eiriksson, Margret Thorsteinsdottir, Michael L Frigge, Augustine Kong, Sigurjon A Gudjonsson, Olafur T Magnusson, Gisli Masson, Albert Hofman, Nigel K Arden, Thorvaldur Ingvarsson, Stefan Lohmander, Margreet Kloppenburg, Fernando Rivadeneira, Rob G H H Nelissen, Tim Spector, Andre Uitterlinden, P Eline Slagboom, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Ingileif Jonsdottir, Ana M Valdes, Ingrid Meulenbelt, Joyce van Meurs, Helgi Jonsson, Kari Stefansson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 62% |
| Scientists | 18 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#559,144
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,105
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,838
of 242,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#11
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.