↓ Skip to main content

The Demography of Mental Health Among Mature Adults in a Low-Income, High-HIV-Prevalence Context

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
The Demography of Mental Health Among Mature Adults in a Low-Income, High-HIV-Prevalence Context
Published in
Demography, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13524-017-0596-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iliana V. Kohler, Collin F. Payne, Chiwoza Bandawe, Hans-Peter Kohler

Abstract

Very few studies have investigated mental health in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Using data from Malawi, this article provides a first picture of the demography of depression and anxiety (DA) among mature adults (aged 45 or older) in a low-income country with high HIV prevalence. DA are more frequent among women than men, and individuals affected by one are often affected by the other. DA are associated with adverse outcomes, such as poorer nutrition intake and reduced work efforts. DA also increase substantially with age, and mature adults can expect to spend a substantial fraction of their remaining lifetime-for instance, 52 % for a 55-year-old woman-affected by DA. The positive age gradients of DA are not due to cohort effects, and they are in sharp contrast to the age pattern of mental health that has been shown in high-income contexts, where older individuals often experience lower levels of DA. Although socioeconomic and risk- or uncertainty-related stressors are strongly associated with DA, they do not explain the positive age gradients and gender gap in DA. Stressors related to physical health, however, do. Hence, our analyses suggest that the general decline of physical health with age is the key driver of the rise of DA with age in this low-income SSA context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 33 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Social Sciences 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 8 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 36 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,672,716
of 24,127,528 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,314
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,599
of 320,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,127,528 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.