↓ Skip to main content

Computerized Training of Working Memory in Children With ADHD-A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1478 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1503 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computerized Training of Working Memory in Children With ADHD-A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Published in
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, February 2005
DOI 10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Torkel Klingberg, Elisabeth Fernell, Pernille J. Olesen, Mats Johnson, Per Gustafsson, Kerstin Dahlström, Christopher G. Gillberg, Hans Forssberg, Helena Westerberg

Abstract

Deficits in executive functioning, including working memory (WM) deficits, have been suggested to be important in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). During 2002 to 2003, the authors conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial to investigate the effect of improving WM by computerized, systematic practice of WM tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 2%
Sweden 10 <1%
Netherlands 9 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
France 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 16 1%
Unknown 1419 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 312 21%
Student > Master 245 16%
Researcher 180 12%
Student > Bachelor 176 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 103 7%
Other 258 17%
Unknown 229 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 687 46%
Social Sciences 126 8%
Neuroscience 99 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 85 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 4%
Other 162 11%
Unknown 285 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#504,580
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#207
of 4,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#791
of 159,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.