↓ Skip to main content

Two independent mutational events in the loss of urate oxidase during hominoid evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,466)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
39 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
426 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Two independent mutational events in the loss of urate oxidase during hominoid evolution
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00163854
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangwei Wu, Donna M. Muzny, Cheng Chi Lee, C. Thomas Caskey

Abstract

Urate oxidase was lost in hominoids during primate evolution. The mechanism and biological reason for this loss remain unknown. In an attempt to address these questions, we analyzed the sequence of urate oxidase genes from four species of hominoids: human (Homo sapiens), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and gibbon (Hylobates). Two nonsense mutations at codon positions 33 and 187 and an aberrant splice site were found in the human gene. These three deleterious mutations were also identified in the chimpanzee. The nonsense mutation at codon 33 was observed in the orangutan urate oxidase gene. None of the three mutations was present in the gibbon; in contrast, a 13-bp deletion was identified that disrupted the gibbon urate oxidase reading frame. These results suggest that the loss of urate oxidase during the evolution of hominoids could be caused by two independent events after the divergence of the gibbon lineage; the nonsense mutation at codon position 33 resulted in the loss of urate oxidase activity in the human, chimpanzee, and orangutan, whereas the 13-bp deletion was responsible for the urate oxidase deficiency in the gibbon. Because the disruption of a functional gene by independent events in two different evolutionary lineages is unlikely to occur on a chance basis, our data favor the hypothesis that the loss of urate oxidase may have evolutionary advantages.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,411,565
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#34
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#664
of 62,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them