↓ Skip to main content

Virtual reality exposure therapy for PTSD Vietnam veterans: A case study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Traumatic Stress, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
Title
Virtual reality exposure therapy for PTSD Vietnam veterans: A case study
Published in
Journal of Traumatic Stress, June 2005
DOI 10.1023/a:1024772308758
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Olasov Rothbaum, Larry Hodges, Renato Alarcon, David Ready, Fran Shahar, Ken Graap, Jarrel Pair, Philip Hebert, Dave Gotz, Brian Wills, David Baltzell

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) integrates real-time computer graphics, body tracking devices, visual displays, and other sensory input devices to immerse a participant in a computer-generated virtual environment that changes in a natural way with head and body motion. VR exposure (VRE) is proposed as an alternative to typical imaginal exposure treatment for Vietnam combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This report presents the results of the first Vietnam combat veteran with PTSD to have been treated with VRE. The patient was exposed to two virtual environments, a virtual Huey helicopter flying over a virtual Vietnam and a clearing surrounded by jungle. The patient experienced a 34% decrease on clinician-rated PTSD and a 45% decrease on self-rated PTSD. Treatment gains were maintained at 6-month follow-up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 297 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 15%
Student > Master 41 13%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 58 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 28%
Computer Science 40 13%
Engineering 24 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 6%
Neuroscience 16 5%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 68 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#829,244
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Traumatic Stress
#71
of 1,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#967
of 64,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Traumatic Stress
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them