↓ Skip to main content

SimpleSTORM: a fast, self-calibrating reconstruction algorithm for localization microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
SimpleSTORM: a fast, self-calibrating reconstruction algorithm for localization microscopy
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00418-014-1211-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ullrich Köthe, Frank Herrmannsdörfer, Ilia Kats, Fred A. Hamprecht

Abstract

Although there are many reconstruction algorithms for localization microscopy, their use is hampered by the difficulty to adjust a possibly large number of parameters correctly. We propose SimpleSTORM, an algorithm that determines appropriate parameter settings directly from the data in an initial self-calibration phase. The algorithm is based on a carefully designed yet simple model of the image acquisition process which allows us to standardize each image such that the background has zero mean and unit variance. This standardization makes it possible to detect spots by a true statistical test (instead of hand-tuned thresholds) and to de-noise the images with an efficient matched filter. By reducing the strength of the matched filter, SimpleSTORM also performs reasonably on data with high-spot density, trading off localization accuracy for improved detection performance. Extensive validation experiments on the ISBI Localization Challenge Dataset, as well as real image reconstructions, demonstrate the good performance of our algorithm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Czechia 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 29%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Computer Science 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,544,447
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#83
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,102
of 231,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.