↓ Skip to main content

Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgements of attractiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychology, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgements of attractiveness
Published in
Current Psychology, March 1999
DOI 10.1007/s12144-999-1020-4
Authors

I. S. Penton- Voak, D. I. Perrett, J. W. Peirce

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Computer Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,223,754
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychology
#413
of 2,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,612
of 35,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.