↓ Skip to main content

Caveolae regulate the nanoscale organization of the plasma membrane to remotely control Ras signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caveolae regulate the nanoscale organization of the plasma membrane to remotely control Ras signaling
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, February 2014
DOI 10.1083/jcb.201307055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Ariotti, Manuel A. Fernández-Rojo, Yong Zhou, Michelle M. Hill, Travis L. Rodkey, Kerry L. Inder, Lukas B. Tanner, Markus R. Wenk, John F. Hancock, Robert G. Parton

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms whereby caveolae exert control over cellular signaling have to date remained elusive. We have therefore explored the role caveolae play in modulating Ras signaling. Lipidomic and gene array analyses revealed that caveolin-1 (CAV1) deficiency results in altered cellular lipid composition, and plasma membrane (PM) phosphatidylserine distribution. These changes correlated with increased K-Ras expression and extensive isoform-specific perturbation of Ras spatial organization: in CAV1-deficient cells K-RasG12V nanoclustering and MAPK activation were enhanced, whereas GTP-dependent lateral segregation of H-Ras was abolished resulting in compromised signal output from H-RasG12V nanoclusters. These changes in Ras nanoclustering were phenocopied by the down-regulation of Cavin1, another crucial caveolar structural component, and by acute loss of caveolae in response to increased osmotic pressure. Thus, we postulate that caveolae remotely regulate Ras nanoclustering and signal transduction by controlling PM organization. Similarly, caveolae transduce mechanical stress into PM lipid alterations that, in turn, modulate Ras PM organization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 26%
Researcher 27 23%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#10,621
of 11,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,272
of 237,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#69
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.