↓ Skip to main content

Rhinovirus illnesses during infancy predict subsequent childhood wheezing

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
645 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rhinovirus illnesses during infancy predict subsequent childhood wheezing
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, September 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.06.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert F. Lemanske, Daniel J. Jackson, Ronald E. Gangnon, Michael D. Evans, Zhanhai Li, Peter A. Shult, Carol J. Kirk, Erik Reisdorf, Kathy A. Roberg, Elizabeth L. Anderson, Kirstin T. Carlson-Dakes, Kiva J. Adler, Stephanie Gilbertson-White, Tressa E. Pappas, Douglas F. DaSilva, Christopher J. Tisler, James E. Gern

Abstract

The contribution of viral respiratory infections during infancy to the development of subsequent wheezing and/or allergic diseases in early childhood is not established.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 220 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 19%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 47 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 59 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 343. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#96,814
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#102
of 11,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78
of 71,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.