↓ Skip to main content

SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
537 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
Title
SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp G. H. Metnitz, Rui P. Moreno, Eduardo Almeida, Barbara Jordan, Peter Bauer, Ricardo Abizanda Campos, Gaetano Iapichino, David Edbrooke, Maurizia Capuzzo, Jean-Roger Le Gall, on behalf of the SAPS 3 Investigators

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 345 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Other 31 8%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Other 98 27%
Unknown 79 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 196 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Computer Science 14 4%
Engineering 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 23 6%
Unknown 89 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,605,699
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,665
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,409
of 71,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.