↓ Skip to main content

Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Health Expectations, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment
Published in
Health Expectations, April 2014
DOI 10.1111/hex.12193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Gerard, Michela Tinelli, Sue Latter, Alesha Smith, Alison Blenkinsopp

Abstract

Recently, primary care in the United Kingdom has undergone substantial changes in skill mix. Non-medical prescribing was introduced to improve patient access to medicines, make better use of different health practitioners' skills and increase patient choice. There is little evidence about value-based patient preferences for 'prescribing nurse' in a general practice setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Other 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,684,157
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Health Expectations
#202
of 1,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,871
of 231,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Expectations
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.