↓ Skip to main content

The Positive Consequences of Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Review, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
64 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Positive Consequences of Pain
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Review, April 2014
DOI 10.1177/1088868314527831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brock Bastian, Jolanda Jetten, Matthew J. Hornsey, Siri Leknes

Abstract

Pain is mostly thought of as a problem-as debilitating or harmful. Despite its unpleasantness, however, under some conditions pain can be associated with positive consequences. In this review, we explore these positive biological, psychological, and social consequences of pain. We highlight three different domains in which pain may be considered to have positive consequences. First, pain facilitates pleasure by providing an important contrast for pleasurable experiences, increasing sensitivity to sensory input, and facilitating self-rewarding behavior. Second, pain augments self-regulation and enhancement by increasing cognitive control, reducing rumination, and demonstrating virtue. Third, pain promotes affiliation by arousing empathy from others, motivating social connection, and enhancing group formation. Drawing on evidence scattered across a range of academic fields, we provide for reflection on how pain is represented, generate insights into pain-seeking behavior, and draw attention to the role of painful experiences in maximizing positive outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Qatar 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 217 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 19%
Student > Bachelor 41 18%
Student > Master 29 12%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 45%
Social Sciences 17 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 47 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#426,643
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Review
#72
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,628
of 233,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Review
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.