↓ Skip to main content

Choice of renal replacement therapy modality and dialysis dependence after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
272 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Choice of renal replacement therapy modality and dialysis dependence after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-2864-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine G. Schneider, Rinaldo Bellomo, Sean M. Bagshaw, Neil J. Glassford, Serigne Lo, Min Jun, Alan Cass, Martin Gallagher

Abstract

Choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality may affect renal recovery after acute kidney injury (AKI). We sought to compare the rate of dialysis dependence among severe AKI survivors according to the choice of initial renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality applied [continuous (CRRT) or intermittent (IRRT)].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 210 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 32 15%
Other 30 14%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 58 27%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Psychology 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 36 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,456,219
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,833
of 5,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,366
of 208,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.