↓ Skip to main content

Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Exposures Following Blood-borne Virus Incidents in Central Australia, 2002–2012

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Exposures Following Blood-borne Virus Incidents in Central Australia, 2002–2012
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2014
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciu227
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Hewagama, S. Krishnaswamy, L. King, J. Davis, R. Baird

Abstract

We retrospectively audited hospital occupational exposure events over a 10-year period, in a human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-endemic area of Central Australia, and report on 53 individuals exposed to HTLV-1 with no transmissions documented (95% confidence interval, 0%-1.5%). This has important implications for the management of exposures including the role of postexposure prophylaxis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,869,583
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#4,565
of 15,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,515
of 228,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#63
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.