You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Population variation in biomonitoring data for persistent organic pollutants (POPs): An examination of multiple population-based datasets for application to Australian pooled biomonitoring data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environment International, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.026 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lesa L. Aylward, Evan Green, Miquel Porta, Leisa-Maree Toms, Elly Den Hond, Christine Schulz, Magda Gasull, Jose Pumarega, André Conrad, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Greet Schoeters, Jochen F. Mueller |
Abstract |
Australian national biomonitoring for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) relies upon age-specific pooled serum samples to characterize central tendencies of concentrations but does not provide estimates of upper bound concentrations. This analysis compares population variation from biomonitoring datasets from the US, Canada, Germany, Spain, and Belgium to identify and test patterns potentially useful for estimating population upper bound reference values for the Australian population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 30% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environment International
#4,030
of 5,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,586
of 240,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment International
#37
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.