↓ Skip to main content

Septicaemia models using Streptococcus pneumoniae and Listeria monocytogenes: understanding the role of complement properdin

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Microbiology and Immunology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 627)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Septicaemia models using Streptococcus pneumoniae and Listeria monocytogenes: understanding the role of complement properdin
Published in
Medical Microbiology and Immunology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00430-013-0324-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Dupont, Fatima Mohamed, Nur’Ain Salehen, Sarah Glenn, Lorenza Francescut, Rozita Adib, Simon Byrne, Hannah Brewin, Irina Elliott, Luke Richards, Petya Dimitrova, Wilhelm Schwaeble, Nina Ivanovska, Aras Kadioglu, Lee R. Machado, Peter W. Andrew, Cordula Stover

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae and Listeria monocytogenes, pathogens which can cause severe infectious disease in human, were used to infect properdin-deficient and wildtype mice. The aim was to deduce a role for properdin, positive regulator of the alternative pathway of complement activation, by comparing and contrasting the immune response of the two genotypes in vivo. We show that properdin-deficient and wildtype mice mounted antipneumococcal serotype-specific IgM antibodies, which were protective. Properdin-deficient mice, however, had increased survival in the model of streptococcal pneumonia and sepsis. Low activity of the classical pathway of complement and modulation of FcγR2b expression appear to be pathogenically involved. In listeriosis, however, properdin-deficient mice had reduced survival and a dendritic cell population that was impaired in maturation and activity. In vitro analyses of splenocytes and bone marrow-derived myeloid cells support the view that the opposing outcomes of properdin-deficient and wildtype mice in these two infection models is likely to be due to a skewing of macrophage activity to an M2 phenotype in the properdin-deficient mice. The phenotypes observed thus appear to reflect the extent to which M2- or M1-polarised macrophages are involved in the immune responses to S. pneumoniae and L. monocytogenes. We conclude that properdin controls the strength of immune responses by affecting humoral as well as cellular phenotypes during acute bacterial infection and ensuing inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 38%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Professor 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,106,977
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Medical Microbiology and Immunology
#12
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,351
of 228,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Microbiology and Immunology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them