↓ Skip to main content

Charité total disc replacement—clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Charité total disc replacement—clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years
Published in
European Spine Journal, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Putzier, Julia F. Funk, Sascha V. Schneider, Christian Gross, Stephan W. Tohtz, Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann, Carsten Perka, Frank Kandziora

Abstract

A retrospective clinical-radiological study to evaluate the long-term outcome after artificial disc replacement was performed. The objective is to investigate long-term results after implantation of a modular type artificial disc prosthesis in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD). Total disc replacement (TDR) is a surgical procedure intended to save segmental spinal function, and thus replace spondylodesis. Short-term results are promising, whereas long-term results are scarce. The Charité TDR is the oldest existing implant, therefore, the longest possible follow-up is presented here. Seventy-one patients were treated with 84 Charité TDRs types I-III. Indication for TDR was moderate to severe DDD. Fifty-three patients (63 TDRs) were available for long-term follow-up of 17 years. Evaluation included Oswestry disability index, visual analog scale, overall outcome score, plain and extension/flexion radiographs. Implantation of Charité TDR resulted in a 60% rate of spontaneous ankylosis after 17 years. No significant difference between the three types of prostheses was found concerning clinical outcome. Reoperation was necessary in 11% of patients. Although no adjacent segment degeneration was observed in the functional implants (17%), these patients were significantly less satisfied than those with spontaneous ankylosis. TDR, nowadays, is an approved procedure. Proof that long-term results of TDR implantation in DDD are at least as good as fusion results is still missing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 98 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 9 9%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 33 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,141,241
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#439
of 4,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,545
of 60,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.