| Title |
Alternative reagents to antibodies in imaging applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-017-0278-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Bedford, C. Tiede, R. Hughes, A. Curd, M. J. McPherson, Michelle Peckham, Darren C. Tomlinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| Germany | 5 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 61% |
| Scientists | 11 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,673,459
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#13
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,867
of 330,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.